91% of clients felt they received good service; 92% felt the lawyers acted in their best interests and were satisfied with the outcome; but on the other hand 25% felt it took too long; 25% felt it was too expensive; maybe the same 25%, maybe not (so that’s up to 50% not really happy).
Think about it – what does that really mean? Add to this that 83% of users of legal services agreed they wouldn’t know how to tell good from bad and you can see where complacency amongst law firms can stem from.
You can see who are the smiling assassins that Lee talks about in his earlier post – the up to c. 41 or 42% who say they are happy but still grumble about fees, timescales .. and whatever else. But scarily, clients carry on using their lawyers regardless without really pressing them for something better (but probably grumble about it anyway) because they don’t know what “better” looks like. So there is a problem here that too many law firms are ignoring. Clients keep coming back in spite of this because they don’t know any better. That is set to change … maybe, so it’s time to beware of complacency and to work harder to provide clients with more of what they really “value” in the services provided by lawyers.
Our recent research shows that too many law firms just don’t work hard enough to give clients a first class experience. Too much is taken for granted when more rapport and empathy with clients would make a world of difference.
Note: These statistics come from the baseline survey conducted by the MoJ in March this year with a representative sample of just under 1000 people, a 46-page report which you can download here.
As further proof of the complacency and missed opportunities here, we will give you some feedback from our recent research on how firms deal with first time enquiries for advice on divorce and family problems in the next few days. See also our earlier post on Cooperative Legal and conveyancing.